Archive for January, 2010

2010-01-09 19:39:15

You Only Live Twice

If I had to pick my least favorite of all the Bond films, 1967′s You Only Live Twice would have to be a serious contender. Why so bad?  Let me count the ways:

  • It follows on the heels of one of the best: Thunderball.  It had to be good to keep up with From Russia With Love and Thunderball — any shortcoming would be magnified, especially if you watch them all one after another without a 2-year break in between.
  • The cheesy special effects (rocket descent, rockets capturing other spacecraft, volcano explosion) make it more like a 60s sci-fi movie than a spy movie.  I know that special effects in the 60s weren’t what they are today, but, ugh.
  • The fight scenes are sub-par.  Contrast the greatness of the fight with Red Grant in the train in From Russia With Love with the comical video-game-style fight with Osato’s dozens of goons at the ship yard in YOLT.
  • The way they treat the Bond Girl, Aki, is downright ridiculous.  With Bond, she takes all day to cross the bay, climb the mountain and descend into the volcano crater, clad only in a bikini and tennis shoes.  It takes her a matter of (what, an hour?) to travel all the way back to Tanaka’s place, swimming across the bay along the way, to get him and his ninjas and return to the crater.  Inside the crater, she’s along for the fight, but does nothing but cower behind people who know how to use weapons.  She really shouldn’t have come, as she’s nothing but a burden.
  • The filmmakers had Bond go under cover by having some sort of operation to turn him into “a Japanese”, as Tanaka says.  The results are horrendous – he just looks and sounds like a Scottish guy with a bad haircut and eyebrows.

OK, so it’s bad.  But there are some redeeming qualities:

  • Osato and his henchman (woman – Helga Brandt) are great Bond villains.
  • Blofeld’s lair hidden inside a hollowed-out volcano — kinda cheesy, I know, but classic nonetheless.  At the time, it was an extravagant set that really sold the movie, and has set the standard for spy-movie supervillains (and their parodies) ever since.
  • Little Nellie is pure brilliance.  So is the helecopter picking up Osata’s goons’ car with a huge magnet and dumping it into the bay.

Quotables:

James Bond: Is this the only room there is?
Kissy Suzuki: Yes. That is your bed,
Kissy Suzuki: I shall sleep over there.
James Bond: But we’re supposed to be married.
Kissy Suzuki: Think again, please. You gave false name to priest.
James Bond: Yes, but we must keep up appearances. We’re on our honeymoon.
Kissy Suzuki: No honeymoon. This is business.

Blofeld: James Bond. Allow me to introduce myself. I am Ernst Stavro Blofeld. They told me you were assassinated in Hong Kong.
James Bond: Yes, this is my second life.
Blofeld: You only live twice, Mr. Bond.

Mr. Osato: You should give up smoking. Cigarettes are very bad for your chest.
Helga Brandt: Mr. Osato believes in healthy chest.

Another odd miscellaneous thing: in this movie, Henderson gives Bond a martini, “stirred, not shaken”, and he accepts.  Usually, of course, it’s “shaken, not stirred”.

So You Only Live twice is worth watching, if only because it’s one of the classic 1960s Bond films, and if you keep in mind that this is the last of the string of the first of the series starring Sean Connery (yeah he made his return in Diamonds are Forever four years later, but George Lazenby’s On Her Majesty’s Secret Service was in between).

Posted by Posted by NeilMeister under Filed under Entertainment Comments 3 Comments »

2010-01-08 19:59:22

Thunderball

Thunderball is one of my favorite Bond movies.  It’s slow and drags on in some places; and some of the special effects, including the boat chase scene at the end, are cheesy looking back at it 40+ years later, but those are the only marks against it in my book.

SPECTRE makes its return in Thunderball — we get an insight into the breadth and depth of this terrorist organization right after the opening credits, several agents in a hidden conference room reporting on the status of various criminal activities around the world.  To advance their scheme of stealing nuclear bombs and holding the NATO countries hostage with them, they’ll stop at nothing, including killing their own and their hired help (by electrocution, piranha pit, drowning, shark attack). Not that I’m a fan of evil, but in a Bond film the villians are of the utmost importance — Emilio Largo is brilliantly cold and ruthless, and Luciana Paluzzi makes Fiona Volpe one of the best femmes fatales in the series.

The budget for Thunderball was more than the budget for all three of the first films combined.  My guess is that a lot of the reason has to do with all the underwater scenes — the photography equipment and setup and such.

Quotables:

Pat Fearing: Funny-looking bruise. A fall?
James Bond: A poker, in the hands of a widow.
Pat Fearing: Really? I’d have thought you were just the type for a widow.
James Bond: Not this one. He didn’t care for me at all.

Bond: Will I see you again?
Domino: It’s a small island.
Bond: Perhaps we can have dinner together?
Domino: No.
Bond: My dear uncooperative Domino.
Domino: How do you know that? How do you know my friends call me Domino?
Bond: It’s on the bracelet on your ankle.
Domino: So, what sharp little eyes you’ve got.
Bond: Wait till you get to my teeth.

Bond: My dear girl, don’t flatter yourself. What I did this evening was for Queen and country. You don’t think it gave me any pleasure, do you?
Fiona: But of course, I forgot your ego, Mr. Bond. James Bond, the one where he has to make love to a woman, and she starts to hear heavenly choirs singing. She repents, and turns to the side of right and virtue… but not this one!

Posted by Posted by NeilMeister under Filed under Entertainment Comments 2 Comments »

2010-01-07 22:12:13

Goldfinger

I haven’t made up my mind yet about Goldfinger.  At one time I thought it was one of the best; more recently I’ve thought it one of the worst.  Right now, I’d have to divide it into two movies and call one half one of the best and the other half one of the worst.

I think Goldfinger is great for the first hour-plus.  I’m going to be controversial here and go against everything I hear: when Miss Galore arrives on the scene, the movie takes a nose dive.  She really doesn’t do anything for me, her ‘flying circus’ of pilot minions is just ridiculous, and for such a strong-willed person she all of a sudden melts at Bond’s advances after they’ve physically fought and he forces himself on her.  Puh-lease.  The scenes of the planes gassing everyone (who unconvincingly “fall down”) around Fort Knox before the raid are embarrassing.  In typical movie-countdown fashion, the nuclear device Bond is trying to disarm takes way too long to count down between cuts alternately showing it and the surrounding action.

So, the bad stuff out of the way… on to observations and such:

Firsts and onlies:

  • The classic and quintessential Bond car shows up for the first time, the Aston Martin DB5.
  • This is the only one of the first 7 (Connery-era) films where nothing to do with SPECTRE is even mentioned (either SPECTRE or its presence implied via its leader Blofeld makes an appearance in the other 6 of the first 7)
  • With the death of Jill Masterson, the theme of a ‘leading’ lady being killed is introduced to the series, a theme which has stuck throughout, recurring in almost every Bond film since.
  • Bond visits the United States for the first time in the series, starting out in Miami and eventually being kidnapped and transported to Goldfinger’s estate in Kentucky near Fort Knox. (Although all the filming for the U.S. scenes were actually filmed in the U.K.)

All in all, a good Bond flick in many regards, but the ridiculousness mentioned above ruins its chances of being a great one. A great plot, and this movie elevates the element of World Travel the movies have been known for.  In the previous two, one location was primary.  Q becomes really a famous character here, and the Aston Martin with e revolving license plates, bulletproof glass, machine guns, oil slick, and ejector seat is pure genius.

Quotables:

James Bond: Auric Goldfinger. Sounds like a French nail varnish.

Q: Now this one I’m particularly keen about. You see the gear lever here? Now, if you take the top off, you will find a little red button. Whatever you do, don’t touch it.
James Bond: Yeah, why not?
Q: Because you’ll release this section of the roof, and engage and then fire the passenger ejector seat. Whish!
James Bond: Ejector seat? You’re joking!
Q: I never joke about my work, 007.

James Bond: My dear girl, there are some things that just aren’t done, such as drinking Dom Perignon ’53 above the temperature of 38 degrees Fahrenheit. That’s just as bad as listening to the Beatles without earmuffs!

James Bond: Do you expect me to talk?
Auric Goldfinger: No, Mr. Bond, I expect you to die!

Goldfinger: Man has climbed Mount Everest, gone to the bottom of the ocean. He’s fired rockets at the Moon, split the atom, achieved miracles in every field of human endeavor… except crime!

Posted by Posted by NeilMeister under Filed under Entertainment Comments 5 Comments »

2010-01-06 01:17:24

From Russia With Love

The second installment in the series From Russia With Love, is, in my opinion, one of the best, if not the best, Bond film of all time.  To be one of the best you have to do the good things well and steer clear of the bad things.  Let’s take a look:

The villains: classic and well done.  Ernst Stavro Blofeld shows up for the first time in the series as the head of SPECTRE, and the suspense of not seeing his face will continue for 4 years (somewhat lost when you view several in a week’s time).  Rosa Klebb and Red Grant are diabolical, but believable unlike a few later Bond Villains.

The good guys: His main ally, Kerim, isn’t squeaky-clean himself, making the line between good and evil a little fuzzy, just like in the real world.  Desmond Llewellen makes his Bond debut as Q, but the Q element here is much less about the guy and much more about the gadgets: the trick suitcase with the hidden throwing knife and the exploding talcum powder canister set the standard for coming decades of gegetry.  The Bond Girl Tatiana is right-on for this movie: the story doesn’t try to do too much with her — many later movies go overboard with the female leads.  I don’t think there’s a “ugh, why did they have to have her do that?” moment in the whole film.

Minimizing the bad stuff: The whole gypsy farm thing was, um, almost pointless (well, it did serve to solidify the friendship between Bond and Kerim), and my least favorite part of the movie.  The gypsy farm gun battle was just too early-sixties-ish.  A worthy criticism of later Bond films is that the effects are just over-the-top, especially relying on explosions to create intense action.  The boat chase near the end of Russia is one scene that got dangerously close, but thankfully didn’t go too far.

Quotables:

Number One: “Kronsteen, you’re sure this plan is fool proof?”
Kronsteen: “Yes, it is, because I have anticipated every variation of counter move.
We all know how that worked out for him.

Tatiana: “The mechanism is… Oh James, James… Will you make love to me all the time in England?”
Bond: “Day and night. Go on about the mechanism.”

Bond: “Pardon me, do you have a match?”
Agent: “I use a lighter.”
Bond: “Better still.”
Agent: “Until they go wrong.”
Bond: “Exactly.”
Classic coded spy dialogue so that each knows that who he’s dealing with is on his side.  Except for some reason SPECTRE agent Grant knows of the pass phrases later in the movie.

Bond: “Red wine with fish. Well, that should have told me something.”
Grant: “I might not know my wines, but you are the one on your knees.”

Bond: [regarding Kerim's chauffeur] He’s a rather intelligent young man.
Kerim: He should be. He’s my son. Coffee?
Bond: Medium sweet.
Kerim: [to attendant] Two, medium sweet.
Kerim: [to Bond] He also is my son. All of my key employees are my sons. Blood is the best security in this business.

Posted by Posted by NeilMeister under Filed under Entertainment Comments 3 Comments »

2010-01-05 19:08:14

Resolved: No Vehicle Purchase in 2010!

I’m not one for New Year’s resolutions.  If anything is worth starting next month or next year, it’s worth starting now.  Besides, I know myself well enough to know that after a few days or weeks I’m going to wonder why I even thought I’d do such-and-such in the first place.

So, this year, not so much a resolution as a goal:  I will endeavor not to buy a vehicle in 2010.

In 2007, our Nissan Maxima got crashed and totaled, making it necessary to purchase another car.  We decided on a 1999 BMW 323i, which turned out to be a rotten deal.  I wouldn’t go so far as to say that we made a mistake purchasing it, because you can’t see the future and you don’t know what you don’t know, but it sure ended up all wrong.  After two $1000+ repairs, and another impending one, in 8 months, we cut our losses in 2008 and got our 2005 Nissan Altima.  It’s been great.

Then in 2009, our old 1997 Altima had enough engine wear that it was going to cost more than it was worth to fix, so we went car shopping again, settling on a 2007 Mazda6.

So, with the Mazda purchase, we are hopeful that our car buying is done for a long time.  We’re hoping for 10 years.  Maybe in 2019 we’ll have to start shopping for vehicles again, so, hopefully no blog posts or news articles regarding vehicle purchases till then.

Posted by Posted by NeilMeister under Filed under $s and ¢s, Around the House Comments Comments Off

2010-01-04 19:04:04

Burj

Well, the Burj Dubai Khalifa, the new tallest building in the world, opened today. I am constantly amazed at super tall buildings, some of the most incredible industrial marvels in the world.  I still don’t know how the engineers and builders can be so sure of structural integrity as literally 100s of 1000s of tons of expensive material and invaluable human lives exert immense stress on the foundation and lower floors.  How do you ‘calculate’ the effects of the various stresses that are outside of your control?

Some questions and observations come to mind as I read a little:

The Burj sets many new height records: notably, in addition to being the tallest building in the world now, it’s the tallest structure too, surpassing even radio towers that were taller than any building. And it has more floors than any other building, the highest observation deck, and the highest swimming pool.

The glitz and spectacular stuff about the building seem to be counterbalanced by the negative: The Dubaians apparently are in massive debt (not as massive as the U.S., of course).  Dubai is one of the emirates that make up the UAE, and after having over-extended itself (perhaps by massive building projects?), it was bailed out by the neighboring emirate of Abu Dhabi, who propped up Dubai with billions of dollars to cover its debts. In gratitude, Dubai named its premiere landmark “Burj Khalifa” after Abu Dhabi’s emir (and UAE President) Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

Maybe everything will turn out OK in the long term for Dubai, but apparently a lot of people in the area see impending economic collapse. Maybe it’s a good investment to build huge developments like Downtown Burj Khalifa (of which the tower is the centerpiece), World Islands and Palm Islands to attract visitors. The idea is to move Dubai’s economy toward tourism and away from oil, since the relatively small oil reserves that made Dubai rich are not going to continue to carry it.

Maybe they bit off more than they can chew, needing outside lenders to support their ambitious investing, if these building projects of unprecedented scale are truly investments. Or maybe they got the big head, letting their pride get in the way of planned growth, the allure of being recognized for their impressive achievements (kind of like these guys) obscuring the purpose of those achievements (presumably to have a strong economy and a stable culture).  If the latter is the case, then it has surely already backfired: do a Google search on the term “Burj Khalifa”, and what you’ll find is more information on Dubai’s economic woes than the impressiveness of their tower.

Oh, and the biggest question in my mind: when will Alain Robert make the climb?

Posted by Posted by NeilMeister under Filed under $s and ¢s, Time and Space Comments Comments Off

2010-01-03 15:22:59

Dr. No

Observations from Dr. No, which I just viewed for the Xth time.  Some observations are my own, and some I grabbed from various places like IMDB.

Joseph Wiseman played the title character Dr. Julius No.  I recall the news of his death recently, on Oct 19, 2009.  Although he was a very prolific TV and film actor whose career spanned five decades, I’ve never seen him in anything else.  Well, I might have seen him in small appearances in Magnum P.I. or The Equalizer or The A-Team or even MacGuyver in the 1980s, but I wouldn’t have known it.

Sean Connery wears a toupée in this and all the other Bond movies he’s in.

I knew that Gert Fröbe’s voice was dubbed for his character Auric Goldfinger in Goldfinger, but what I didn’t know was that two Bond Girls’ voices were dubbed (Ursula Andress as Honey Ryder and Eunice Gayson as Sylvia Trench) by the same voice artist (Nikki Van der Zyl) in Dr. No.  In fact, many villains in the early Bond movies (Blofeld in From Russia With Love, Goldfinger in Goldfinger, Largo in Thunderball, Tanaka in You Only Live Twice) and other leading ladies (Daniela Bianchi as Tatiana Romanova in From Russia With Love and Claudine Auger as Domino in Thunderball) had their voices dubbed.  Why so much with the dubbing?  Why not find actors whose voices were more suitable, or just go with a heavier accent if they speak English well enough?

Major Boothroyd presents Bond with a Walther PPK to replace his Beretta.  This is the only time Boothroyd (You know him a “Q”) was not played by Desmond Llewellen until his death (auto accident) in 1999 after The World is Not Enough.

A noteworthy feature of the Bond movies is that in each one, there is an opening scene that plays out before the opening credits (sometimes having nothing to do with the rest of the film).  Dr. No is the only film in which there is no such pre-credits opening scene.

In Summary: Dr. No is the original.  Sean Connery is the ultimate Bond (though Daniel-Craig-Bond could no doubt beat up Sean-Connery-Bond).  The plot is classic spy fare: the larger-than-life, quirky villain is bent on world domination, and his overconfidence and underestimation of the triumph of Good over Evil becomes his downfall.  Likely because it was made in 1962 on a relatively low-budget, it’s not over-produced: dialogue and intrigue take precedence over explosions and effects.

Quotables:

Bond: I admire your courage, Miss…?
Sylvia Trench: Trench. Sylvia Trench. I admire your luck, Mr…?
Bond: Bond. James Bond.

Sylvia Trench: When did you say you had to leave?
Bond
: Immediately
Sylvia Trench: [starts kissing him]
Bond: almost immediately

Honey: [startled at Bond's voice on the beach, where she thought she was alone] Who’s that?
Bond: It’s all right. I’m not supposed to be here either. I take it you’re not. Are you alone?
Honey: What are you doing here? Looking for shells?
Bond: No, I’m just looking.
Honey: Stay where you are.
Bond: I promise I won’t steal your shells.
Honey: I promise you you won’t either. Stay where you are! [she wields her knife]

Posted by Posted by NeilMeister under Filed under Entertainment Comments 3 Comments »

| Log in